Raja vs Radha Advocate - S.Senthilkumaran D1,D3,D — 200194/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7Rule1ofC.P.C,25(d),27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG140001992015
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
200194/2015
Filing Date
08-06-2015
Registration No
200194/2015
Registration Date
19-06-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raja
Adv. V.Agoram, No.9.Vadarayan street, Madurantakam.
Muniyammal
Logammal
Veeramuthu
Abborvammal
Kuppammal
Respondent(s)
Radha Advocate - S.Senthilkumaran D1,D3,D
Krishnan
Ajeethkumar
R.Vasantha Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
IA Pending
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | IA Pending |
| 05-06-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 29-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 27-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 15-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.194/2015 - I.A.No.12/2025 The District Munsif at Madurantakam dismissed the plaintiffs' petition seeking to reopen the suit and mark a xerox copy of a 2010 sale agreement as evidence. The court found the petition unwarranted and lacking merit, noting the plaintiffs themselves admitted the agreement was never acted upon and defendants denied its execution. Since the primary issue in an injunction suit is possession, not the agreement's validity, the petition was dismissed with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S.No.194/2015 - I.A.No.12/2025 The District Munsif at Madurantakam dismissed the plaintiffs' petition seeking to reopen the suit and mark a xerox copy of a 2010 sale agreement as evidence. The court found the petition unwarranted and lacking merit, noting the plaintiffs themselves admitted the agreement was never acted upon and defendants denied its execution. Since the primary issue in an injunction suit is possession, not the agreement's validity, the petition was dismissed with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts