S. Nagarathinammal vs The District Collector Advocate - Exparte — 115/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG140001352017
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
115/2017
Filing Date
27-07-2017
Registration No
115/2017
Registration Date
27-07-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Nagarathinammal
Adv. R.S. Ranganathan
K.S. Shanmugam
S. Tamilselvan
S. Senthilnathan
S. Rajasekar
Respondent(s)
The District Collector Advocate - Exparte
The revenue divisional officer
The Thasildar State Government
P.S. Sekar
M.R. Gunasekaran
Adv. Subramanian S
M.R. Balasumramanian
Adv. Subramanian.S.
M.R. Jaya
M.R. Prema
Adv. Subramanian.S.
M.R. Ramesh
Adv. Subramanian.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 20-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 115/2017 Court: District Civil Court, Maduranthakam Parties: S. Nagarathinammal, K.S. Shanmugam, and S. Tamilselvan (petitioners) v. The District Collector and Revenue Officials (respondents) Outcome: The case was adjourned. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted with documentary evidence, and cross-examination of respondent witnesses was postponed at the request of respondent's counsel. Multiple hearing notices were issued to the respondents between August 2016 and July 2017, with the case proceeding through successive adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 115/2017 Court: District Civil Court, Maduranthakam Parties: S. Nagarathinammal, K.S. Shanmugam, and S. Tamilselvan (petitioners) v. The District Collector and Revenue Officials (respondents) Outcome: The case was adjourned. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted with documentary evidence, and cross-examination of respondent witnesses was postponed at the request of respondent's counsel. Multiple hearing notices were issued to the respondents between August 2016 and July 2017, with the case proceeding through successive adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts