Mayavan vs Raman and 8 others Advocate - Exparte — 200232/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG140000902012
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
200232/2012
Filing Date
24-08-2012
Registration No
200232/2012
Registration Date
24-08-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mayavan
Adv. Subramanian S
Respondent(s)
Raman and 8 others Advocate - Exparte
Vijaya
Adv. Exparte
Minor.Palani
Adv. Exparte
Minor.Palaniammal
Adv. Exparte
Minor.Lakshmi
Adv. Exparte
Minor.Raja
Adv. Exparte
Chinnakka
Adv. V. Agoram
Parameswaran
Adv. Sri.Ambrose
Dhanalakshmi
Adv. Paramasivam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Judgement |
| 01-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Copy of Order
Summary of Case 200232/2012 (Mayavan v. Raman and 8 others) In this cross-examination continuation hearing dated 07/04/2026 on Interlocutory Applications 19/2026 and 20/2026, the court examined the petitioner's testimony regarding documents (Exhibits 11-14) concerning property ownership and inheritance claims. The petitioner was recalled for cross-examination regarding whether he is the heir of one Ramadas (a mason) and his knowledge of property sale/purchase transactions. The court's order reflects the progression of the cross-examination process, with the court clarifying the admissibility and relevance of various documents and the petitioner's statements concerning property records and heirship, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 200232/2012 (Mayavan v. Raman and 8 others) In this cross-examination continuation hearing dated 07/04/2026 on Interlocutory Applications 19/2026 and 20/2026, the court examined the petitioner's testimony regarding documents (Exhibits 11-14) concerning property ownership and inheritance claims. The petitioner was recalled for cross-examination regarding whether he is the heir of one Ramadas (a mason) and his knowledge of property sale/purchase transactions. The court's order reflects the progression of the cross-examination process, with the court clarifying the admissibility and relevance of various documents and the petitioner's statements concerning property records and heirship, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts