Santhanakumar vs The Thasildar, Madurantakam Advocate - Exparte — 35/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27c. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG140000632022
Filing Number
72/2022
Filing Date
25-Mar-2022
Registration No
35/2022
Registration Date
29-Mar-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santhanakumar
Adv. Subramanian.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Thasildar, Madurantakam Advocate - Exparte
-
2.The Revenue Divisional officer
-
3.The District collector
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For further Proceedings
District Munsif
-
15-Apr-2026
Steps
District Munsif
-
16-Mar-2026
Steps
District Munsif
-
11-Mar-2026
Amendment
District Munsif
-
18-Feb-2026
Amendment
District Munsif
-
02-Feb-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
20-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
11-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
21-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
26-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
21-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
14-Feb-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Jan-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Jan-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
11-Dec-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
04-Dec-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
22-Nov-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Nov-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
19-Oct-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
27-Sep-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Sep-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
09-Sep-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
23-Aug-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
12-Aug-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: I.A. No. 4/2022 in O.S. No. 35/2022 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED with no costs. K. Nandagopal sought to be impleaded as the 4th defendant in Santhanakumar's suit for permanent injunction over suit property (S.No.31). Nandagopal claimed he owns adjacent lands and uses the disputed property as a common access way to reach his own fields. The court found Nandagopal would only be incidentally affected by the judgment and lacks necessary party status under Order I Rule 10 CPC, as the core dispute regarding Santhanakumar's possession and alleged interference by revenue officials can be decided without him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jul-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
02-Jul-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
21-Jun-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
10-Jun-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
23-Apr-2024
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
23-Apr-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Apr-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
15-Mar-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Feb-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Feb-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
05-Jan-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
18-Dec-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
28-Nov-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Nov-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
20-Oct-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Oct-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
29-Sep-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
13-Sep-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
30-Aug-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
09-Aug-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
25-Jul-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Jul-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
21-Jul-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
14-Jul-2023
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
14-Jul-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Jul-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
20-Jun-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
06-Mar-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Feb-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Feb-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Jan-2023
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Dec-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
12-Dec-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
05-Dec-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
23-Nov-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Nov-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
09-Nov-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Nov-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Oct-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
18-Oct-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
27-Sep-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Sep-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
06-Sep-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
11-Aug-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
28-Jul-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
28-Jun-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
29-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2022
Case Summary: I.A. No. 4/2022 in O.S. No. 35/2022 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED with no costs. K. Nandagopal sought to be impleaded as the 4th defendant in Santhanakumar's suit for permanent injunction over suit property (S.No.31). Nandagopal claimed he owns adjacent lands and uses the disputed property as a common access way to reach his own fields. The court found Nandagopal would only be incidentally affected by the judgment and lacks necessary party status under Order I Rule 10 CPC, as the core dispute regarding Santhanakumar's possession and alleged interference by revenue officials can be decided without him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts