Nehru Thairiyam and 2 others vs Praveen Kumar and 2 others Advocate - D1, D2, D4, M.Tamilmaran, — 200196/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG140000322012
Filing Number
200196/2012
Filing Date
18-07-2012
Registration No
200196/2012
Registration Date
18-07-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nehru Thairiyam and 2 others
Adv. Paramasiram
Kasthuri Nelsan
Kasthuri Nelsan
Adv. paramasivam,
Rechal Joyal
Adv. paramasivam,
Respondent(s)
Praveen Kumar and 2 others Advocate - D1, D2, D4, M.Tamilmaran,
Ramnath
Adv. J.Ravindiran
The Sub Registrat Office,
Adv. M.B.Srinivasan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.No.196/2012 Court Decision: The District Munsif at Madurantakam fully decreed the plaintiffs' suit. The court declared the plaintiffs' title over the disputed agricultural properties and granted permanent injunctions restraining defendants from interfering with possession or alienating the property. Additionally, the partition deed (12.08.2011) and agreement deed (10.11.2016) executed by defendants were declared null and void, as the defendants had already sold their ancestral shares to third parties in 1994 and thus lacked authority over the properties. Key Reasoning: The court found that plaintiffs' parents had validly purchased the properties through registered sale deeds traceable to 1923, while defendants could not establish independent title based solely on revenue records when confronted with documented sales spanning decades. Prior judgments in related cases supported the plaintiffs' ownership claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.196/2012 Court Decision: The District Munsif at Madurantakam fully decreed the plaintiffs' suit. The court declared the plaintiffs' title over the disputed agricultural properties and granted permanent injunctions restraining defendants from interfering with possession or alienating the property. Additionally, the partition deed (12.08.2011) and agreement deed (10.11.2016) executed by defendants were declared null and void, as the defendants had already sold their ancestral shares to third parties in 1994 and thus lacked authority over the properties. Key Reasoning: The court found that plaintiffs' parents had validly purchased the properties through registered sale deeds traceable to 1923, while defendants could not establish independent title based solely on revenue records when confronted with documented sales spanning decades. Prior judgments in related cases supported the plaintiffs' ownership claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts