Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd rep by Mr. T.K.J. Sridharan vs T. Philip Advocate - P.S.George — 16/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNCG140000292018

IA Pending

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

16/2018

Filing Date

05-02-2018

Registration No

16/2018

Registration Date

05-02-2018

Court

District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd rep by Mr. T.K.J. Sridharan

Adv. M. Kandasamy

Respondent(s)

T. Philip Advocate - P.S.George

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

09-06-2026

IA Pending

10-04-2026

IA Pending

16-03-2026

IA Pending

12-03-2026

Steps

27-02-2026

Steps

Interim Orders

23-02-2024
Copy of Order
02-04-2024
Copy of Order

Case Summary: O.S. No. 16/2018 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The District Munsif appointed Advocate Commissioner D. Parthiban to measure the disputed properties and document their physical features with the help of the Taluk Head Surveyor. The Commissioner must submit a report with rough sketch by 04.06.2024. The 2nd Petitioner/Plaintiff must pay Rs. 7,000 as the Commissioner's remuneration. Key Issue: Whether to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to determine the exact location and demarcation of properties in a boundary dispute involving a borewell located on the plaintiffs' property that the defendant allegedly encroached upon and damaged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 16/2018 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The District Munsif appointed Advocate Commissioner D. Parthiban to measure the disputed properties and document their physical features with the help of the Taluk Head Surveyor. The Commissioner must submit a report with rough sketch by 04.06.2024. The 2nd Petitioner/Plaintiff must pay Rs. 7,000 as the Commissioner's remuneration. Key Issue: Whether to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to determine the exact location and demarcation of properties in a boundary dispute involving a borewell located on the plaintiffs' property that the defendant allegedly encroached upon and damaged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case