Rajivugandhi vs Janaki — 97/2019
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(1-a). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCG130009502019
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
998/2019
Filing Date
29-11-2019
Registration No
97/2019
Registration Date
17-12-2019
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajivugandhi
Adv. Jaisankar.K
Respondent(s)
Janaki
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Orders |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 97/2019 (Rajivugandhi v. Janaki) This case involves cross-examination testimony regarding a marriage dispute. The witness testified for Janaki on 09.02.2026 before the Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam. The witness denied receiving any payment to testify, clarified that the petitioner and respondent were married on 21.11.2016 at Achyarakam Murugan Temple, and stated the couple has lived separately since 2016. The witness denied allegations of coercing the marriage or administering abortion medication, and rejected claims of receiving ₹10,000 to provide false testimony. The court proceedings were ongoing with witness examination completed and cross-examination concluded without further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 97/2019 (Rajivugandhi v. Janaki) This case involves cross-examination testimony regarding a marriage dispute. The witness testified for Janaki on 09.02.2026 before the Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam. The witness denied receiving any payment to testify, clarified that the petitioner and respondent were married on 21.11.2016 at Achyarakam Murugan Temple, and stated the couple has lived separately since 2016. The witness denied allegations of coercing the marriage or administering abortion medication, and rejected claims of receiving ₹10,000 to provide false testimony. The court proceedings were ongoing with witness examination completed and cross-examination concluded without further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts