Dhayalan vs Govindarajulu — 15/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 43. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 21st April 2026.
CMA - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
CNR: TNCG130004912018
Filing Number
1100015/2018
Filing Date
28-11-2018
Registration No
15/2018
Registration Date
28-11-2018
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhayalan
Adv. S.Subramanian, S.Suresh, A.Abdul Hayath
Sharmila
Respondent(s)
Govindarajulu
Kala represented by her agent Andal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 23-02-2026 | Orders |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMA 15/2018 The appellate court reversed the trial court's temporary injunction order, finding that Govindarajulu (the plaintiff/respondent) failed to prove actual possession of the disputed property or establish a prima facie case. Although Govindarajulu produced title documents including a 1978 settlement deed and a 2012 sale deed, the court held these were insufficient—possession must be evidenced by documents like adangal extracts and tax receipts in the claimant's name, which he never provided. The court dismissed the temporary injunction application entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CMA 15/2018 The appellate court reversed the trial court's temporary injunction order, finding that Govindarajulu (the plaintiff/respondent) failed to prove actual possession of the disputed property or establish a prima facie case. Although Govindarajulu produced title documents including a 1978 settlement deed and a 2012 sale deed, the court held these were insufficient—possession must be evidenced by documents like adangal extracts and tax receipts in the claimant's name, which he never provided. The court dismissed the temporary injunction application entirely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts