Pounammal vs Chinnakuzhandhai and others Advocate - G.G.Manikandan — 100166/2014
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG130004872014
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
1000166/2014
Filing Date
02-12-2014
Registration No
100166/2014
Registration Date
02-12-2014
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pounammal
Adv. R. Arumugam
Respondent(s)
Chinnakuzhandhai and others Advocate - G.G.Manikandan
chinnakuzhanthai
Siva
Govindammal
Anjalakshi
Srinivasan
mohana
Arnachalam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | IA Pending |
| 05-06-2026 | IA Pending |
| 30-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 28-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 166/2014 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 09.03.2026 Witnesses 1-6 were examined and cross-examined. The court heard testimony regarding property disputes and family succession matters involving a 1970 partition agreement and a 2012 death. The court found insufficient evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims regarding the partition and succession documents, noting no proper signatures or acknowledgment of the disputed 1970 deed. The suit was dismissed due to lack of credible documentary evidence and witness testimony establishing the petitioner's entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 166/2014 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 09.03.2026 Witnesses 1-6 were examined and cross-examined. The court heard testimony regarding property disputes and family succession matters involving a 1970 partition agreement and a 2012 death. The court found insufficient evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims regarding the partition and succession documents, noting no proper signatures or acknowledgment of the disputed 1970 deed. The suit was dismissed due to lack of credible documentary evidence and witness testimony establishing the petitioner's entitlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts