Minnala vs Nagaraj — 100/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNCG130004692023
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
451/2023
Filing Date
28-04-2023
Registration No
100/2023
Registration Date
03-11-2023
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minnala
Adv. Senthilnathan
Vijayalakshmi
Jayasri
Respondent(s)
Nagaraj
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Petition (MCOP No. 100/2023) heard in the Maduranthakam Subordinate Court on February 23, 2026. The case involves petitioners Minnala, Vijayalakshmi, and Jayasri against respondent Nagaraj and Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. The court document records the examination of PW2 (prosecution witness 2), a witness who testified regarding a fatal motorcycle accident involving the deceased Surya Kumar. The witness provided testimony under cross-examination by both respondents' counsel, detailing the accident circumstances, injuries sustained, and emergency response. The court completed the witness examination proceedings on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Petition (MCOP No. 100/2023) heard in the Maduranthakam Subordinate Court on February 23, 2026. The case involves petitioners Minnala, Vijayalakshmi, and Jayasri against respondent Nagaraj and Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. The court document records the examination of PW2 (prosecution witness 2), a witness who testified regarding a fatal motorcycle accident involving the deceased Surya Kumar. The witness provided testimony under cross-examination by both respondents' counsel, detailing the accident circumstances, injuries sustained, and emergency response. The court completed the witness examination proceedings on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts