Minnala vs Nagaraj — 100/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCG130004692023

Filing Number

451/2023

Filing Date

28-Apr-2023

Registration No

100/2023

Registration Date

03-Nov-2023

Court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,140

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Minnala

    Adv. Senthilnathan

  2. 2.Vijayalakshmi

  3. 3.Jayasri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagaraj

  2. 2.Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co.Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Petition (MCOP No. 100/2023) heard in the Maduranthakam Subordinate Court on February 23, 2026. The case involves petitioners Minnala, Vijayalakshmi, and Jayasri against respondent Nagaraj and Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. The court document records the examination of PW2 (prosecution witness 2), a witness who testified regarding a fatal motorcycle accident involving the deceased Surya Kumar. The witness provided testimony under cross-examination by both respondents' counsel, detailing the accident circumstances, injuries sustained, and emergency response. The court completed the witness examination proceedings on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Restored

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 11-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 11-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 11-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 02-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 03-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 03-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 27-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 28-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 21-Aug-2024

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 07-Aug-2024

    Amendment

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 04-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 20-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 14-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 08-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 05-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 28-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Petition (MCOP No. 100/2023) heard in the Maduranthakam Subordinate Court on February 23, 2026. The case involves petitioners Minnala, Vijayalakshmi, and Jayasri against respondent Nagaraj and Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. The court document records the examination of PW2 (prosecution witness 2), a witness who testified regarding a fatal motorcycle accident involving the deceased Surya Kumar. The witness provided testimony under cross-examination by both respondents' counsel, detailing the accident circumstances, injuries sustained, and emergency response. The court completed the witness examination proceedings on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case