State Government vs Murugan — 100123/2014
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 4(1)(aaa),4(1-A). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNCG130004372014
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1000123/2014
Filing Date
07-11-2014
Registration No
100123/2014
Registration Date
07-11-2014
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
707
Police Station
AWPS MADURANTHAKAM
Year
2007
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Murugan
Arumugam
Sathya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 05-06-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 24-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 23-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 27-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100123/2014 Case: SC.123/2014 (State Government v. Murugan, Arumugam, and Sathya) Outcome: The court rejected the cross-examination testimony of Witness PW2 (a health department official) regarding alleged drug seizure proceedings. The witness testified about a purported seizure of 20 packets containing narcotics from respondents on a specified date, but the court found significant credibility issues. The court determined the witness's account was unreliable due to inconsistencies regarding evidence collection procedures, chain of custody, and documentation. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish the validity of the alleged seizure and proceedings, thereby rejecting the basis of the charges against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100123/2014 Case: SC.123/2014 (State Government v. Murugan, Arumugam, and Sathya) Outcome: The court rejected the cross-examination testimony of Witness PW2 (a health department official) regarding alleged drug seizure proceedings. The witness testified about a purported seizure of 20 packets containing narcotics from respondents on a specified date, but the court found significant credibility issues. The court determined the witness's account was unreliable due to inconsistencies regarding evidence collection procedures, chain of custody, and documentation. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish the validity of the alleged seizure and proceedings, thereby rejecting the basis of the charges against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts