C.Munusamy Naidu and 7 others vs Thulasiammal and 3 others Advocate - K.Ayyasamy — 100088/2016
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section vIIRuleIofcpc. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG130004312016
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
1100088/2016
Filing Date
21-10-2016
Registration No
100088/2016
Registration Date
21-10-2016
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C.Munusamy Naidu and 7 others
Adv. S. Subramanian
Respondent(s)
Thulasiammal and 3 others Advocate - K.Ayyasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Enquiry
Counter
Counter
Counter
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-06-2026 | Counter |
| 29-04-2026 | Counter |
| 15-04-2026 | Counter |
| 06-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court allowed the petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 99-day delay in restoring I.A. No. 111/2019, which had been dismissed for default. The petitioner (4th defendant), aged 69, sought to restore the petition for expert examination of a document dated 01.04.1978 after the death of the 1st plaintiff created complications requiring impleading of legal heirs. The court found the delay reasonable given pending heir proceedings and age-related health issues, ruling that dismissal on technical grounds would defeat substantive rights. The petition was allowed conditionally upon payment of Rs. 1,000 to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 99-day delay in restoring I.A. No. 111/2019, which had been dismissed for default. The petitioner (4th defendant), aged 69, sought to restore the petition for expert examination of a document dated 01.04.1978 after the death of the 1st plaintiff created complications requiring impleading of legal heirs. The court found the delay reasonable given pending heir proceedings and age-related health issues, ruling that dismissal on technical grounds would defeat substantive rights. The petition was allowed conditionally upon payment of Rs. 1,000 to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts