Vijaya vs H.Bajeesubramanian — 57/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNCG130003512019

Filing Number

370/2019

Filing Date

05-Apr-2019

Registration No

57/2019

Registration Date

15-Apr-2019

Court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaya

    Adv. T. Sathiyamoorthy

  2. 2.E.Sureshkumar

  3. 3.E.Ramesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.Bajeesubramanian

  2. 2.The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: MCOP 57/2019 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 17.04.2026 The court examined a dispute involving Section 39 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioner's father was alleged to have engaged in unauthorized commercial transport activities. The court found that while the father conducted such activities, he properly paid income tax with supporting documentation. Consequently, the court held that the Section 39 violation was not sustainable. The petition was dismissed, and the respondent's objections were rejected accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 02-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 04-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 04-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 07-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 02-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 02-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 28-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 16-Jun-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 21-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 24-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 17-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 04-Mar-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 04-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 28-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 07-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 21-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 13-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 07-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  49. 19-Jan-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  50. 05-Jan-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  51. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  52. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  53. 17-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  54. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  55. 22-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  56. 18-Aug-2023

    List / Special List

    Subordinate Judge

  57. 07-Jul-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  58. 30-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  59. 09-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  60. 27-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  61. 28-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  62. 03-Jan-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  63. 12-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  64. 09-Nov-2022

    Restored

    Subordinate Judge

  65. 09-Nov-2022

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  66. 29-Nov-2019

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  67. 29-Nov-2019

    Disposed

    Subordinate Judge

  68. 25-Oct-2019

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  69. 30-Aug-2019

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  70. 17-Jul-2019

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  71. 04-Jun-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 05-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCOP 57/2019 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 17.04.2026 The court examined a dispute involving Section 39 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioner's father was alleged to have engaged in unauthorized commercial transport activities. The court found that while the father conducted such activities, he properly paid income tax with supporting documentation. Consequently, the court held that the Section 39 violation was not sustainable. The petition was dismissed, and the respondent's objections were rejected accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case