Kalyani vs Annadurai — 92/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 7rule1. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG130003322021

Filing Number

359/2021

Filing Date

27-Jul-2021

Registration No

92/2021

Registration Date

23-Aug-2021

Court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalyani

    Adv. S.Prathap

  2. 2.Kalidoss

  3. 3.Balaji

  4. 4.Sureshkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Annadurai

  2. 2.Muthulakshmi

  3. 3.Gnanasekar

  4. 4.Vijayalakshmi

  5. 5.Parimala

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 03-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 24-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary of OS. No. 92/2021 In this property dispute heard on 24.09.2025 before the Subordinate Court at Maduranthakam, the court examined testimony regarding ancestral properties and their ownership among family members Kalyani, Kalidoss, Balaji, Annadurai, Muthulakshmi, and Gnanasekar. The witness (Gnanasekar) testified about partition of properties in 2006, claims regarding original property documents, and disputed ownership of agricultural land acquired in various names. The court found the petitioners' arguments regarding co-ownership and equal rights in the joint properties inadequately supported and dismissed the petition, ruling that the respondents are entitled to maintain their position regarding the property distribution without granting the relief sought by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 19-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  24. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 05-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 22-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 21-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  29. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 03-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 08-Apr-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  34. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 08-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 05-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 21-Jan-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  39. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 21-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 19-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 19-Aug-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 08-Jun-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 05-Jun-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 06-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 20-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 14-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  49. 24-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  50. 21-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  51. 30-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  52. 10-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  53. 12-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Subordinate Judge

  54. 17-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  55. 03-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  56. 20-Jul-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  57. 13-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  58. 07-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  59. 09-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  60. 24-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Subordinate Judge

  61. 11-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  62. 22-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  63. 29-Jun-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  64. 30-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  65. 20-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  66. 18-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  67. 05-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 27-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of OS. No. 92/2021 In this property dispute heard on 24.09.2025 before the Subordinate Court at Maduranthakam, the court examined testimony regarding ancestral properties and their ownership among family members Kalyani, Kalidoss, Balaji, Annadurai, Muthulakshmi, and Gnanasekar. The witness (Gnanasekar) testified about partition of properties in 2006, claims regarding original property documents, and disputed ownership of agricultural land acquired in various names. The court found the petitioners' arguments regarding co-ownership and equal rights in the joint properties inadequately supported and dismissed the petition, ruling that the respondents are entitled to maintain their position regarding the property distribution without granting the relief sought by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case