Kalyani vs Annadurai — 92/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 7rule1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG130003322021
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
359/2021
Filing Date
27-07-2021
Registration No
92/2021
Registration Date
23-08-2021
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalyani
Adv. S.Prathap
Kalidoss
Balaji
Sureshkumar
Respondent(s)
Annadurai
Muthulakshmi
Gnanasekar
Vijayalakshmi
Parimala
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 02-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary of OS. No. 92/2021 In this property dispute heard on 24.09.2025 before the Subordinate Court at Maduranthakam, the court examined testimony regarding ancestral properties and their ownership among family members Kalyani, Kalidoss, Balaji, Annadurai, Muthulakshmi, and Gnanasekar. The witness (Gnanasekar) testified about partition of properties in 2006, claims regarding original property documents, and disputed ownership of agricultural land acquired in various names. The court found the petitioners' arguments regarding co-ownership and equal rights in the joint properties inadequately supported and dismissed the petition, ruling that the respondents are entitled to maintain their position regarding the property distribution without granting the relief sought by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of OS. No. 92/2021 In this property dispute heard on 24.09.2025 before the Subordinate Court at Maduranthakam, the court examined testimony regarding ancestral properties and their ownership among family members Kalyani, Kalidoss, Balaji, Annadurai, Muthulakshmi, and Gnanasekar. The witness (Gnanasekar) testified about partition of properties in 2006, claims regarding original property documents, and disputed ownership of agricultural land acquired in various names. The court found the petitioners' arguments regarding co-ownership and equal rights in the joint properties inadequately supported and dismissed the petition, ruling that the respondents are entitled to maintain their position regarding the property distribution without granting the relief sought by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts