Poongavanam vs Thavalagiri Advocate - L.Udayakumar — 10/2021

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG130002982020

Arguments

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

322/2020

Filing Date

12-10-2020

Registration No

10/2021

Registration Date

18-01-2021

Court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 7rule1

Petitioner(s)

Poongavanam

Adv. Munsamy B

Puvaneshwari

Sivakumar

Anand

Respondent(s)

Thavalagiri Advocate - L.Udayakumar

Ponnan

Ekambaram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

12-06-2026

Arguments

30-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

02-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: OS. No. 10/2021 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 02.03.2026 In this property dispute involving inheritance rights, the court examined testimony regarding a 2 acres 40 cents property (Plot No. 287/21B). The court found that Lakrishnan gifted only 69 cents to the first defendant, not the entire property as claimed, and that the other defendants (Kupuswami, Ponnan, and Ekambaram) have no ownership rights in the property. The case proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination, with the court recording findings on the extent of the gift transfer and rejecting claims of broader property interests by other parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS. No. 10/2021 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 02.03.2026 In this property dispute involving inheritance rights, the court examined testimony regarding a 2 acres 40 cents property (Plot No. 287/21B). The court found that Lakrishnan gifted only 69 cents to the first defendant, not the entire property as claimed, and that the other defendants (Kupuswami, Ponnan, and Ekambaram) have no ownership rights in the property. The case proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination, with the court recording findings on the extent of the gift transfer and rejecting claims of broader property interests by other parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case