Usha vs Velu — 4/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNCG130002532020
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
273/2020
Filing Date
24-09-2020
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
06-01-2021
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Usha
Adv. Prakash Raj.I
Respondent(s)
Velu
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, DO-, Chennai,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Appearance
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-06-2026 | Appearance |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP No. 4/2021 Court: Subordinate Court, Madhurantakam Parties: Usha (Petitioner) vs. Velu and The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (Respondents) Outcome: On August 7, 2025, the court recorded the testimony of PW3 (third prosecution witness) under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding a vehicle accident involving a truck that struck a van without stopping. The witness stated she was standing approximately 2 feet behind the van's occupants and could not see the truck's registration number due to the sudden impact. The court completed the examination and cross-examination of the witness, with no re-examination requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP No. 4/2021 Court: Subordinate Court, Madhurantakam Parties: Usha (Petitioner) vs. Velu and The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (Respondents) Outcome: On August 7, 2025, the court recorded the testimony of PW3 (third prosecution witness) under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding a vehicle accident involving a truck that struck a van without stopping. The witness stated she was standing approximately 2 feet behind the van's occupants and could not see the truck's registration number due to the sudden impact. The court completed the examination and cross-examination of the witness, with no re-examination requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts