Saraswathi vs Velu — 3/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNCG130002512020
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
271/2020
Filing Date
24-09-2020
Registration No
3/2021
Registration Date
06-01-2021
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saraswathi
Adv. Prakash Raj. I
Respondent(s)
Velu
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, DO-5, Chennai
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Arguments
Appearance
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-06-2026 | Appearance |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP No. 3/2021 On August 7, 2025, the Maduranthakam Subordinate Court recorded the testimony of PW3 (third witness) under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding a vehicle collision incident, stating that a lorry hit a van without stopping, and the witness was standing approximately 2 feet behind the van. The witness confirmed the accuracy of their prior statement and identified their signature and Aadhar card (Exhibit 3). Cross-examination of the respondent's witness was completed with no re-examination requested. The court order indicates the proceedings were recorded on this date as part of the ongoing evidence collection in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP No. 3/2021 On August 7, 2025, the Maduranthakam Subordinate Court recorded the testimony of PW3 (third witness) under Section 6(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. The witness testified regarding a vehicle collision incident, stating that a lorry hit a van without stopping, and the witness was standing approximately 2 feet behind the van. The witness confirmed the accuracy of their prior statement and identified their signature and Aadhar card (Exhibit 3). Cross-examination of the respondent's witness was completed with no re-examination requested. The court order indicates the proceedings were recorded on this date as part of the ongoing evidence collection in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts