Tamilselvan vs Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Vilupuram Ltd — 30/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140&166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNCG130002372024
e-Filing Number
23-04-2024
Filing Number
233/2024
Filing Date
30-May-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
06-Jun-2024
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tamilselvan
Adv. D.G.Manikandan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Vilupuram Ltd
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
In MCOP No. 30/2024 before the Madhurantakam Subordinate Court, the petition filed by Tamilselvan against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vilupuram Ltd was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish his claims regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred at 5:15 AM, and rejected his arguments about negligence and causation. The petition is accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2024
In MCOP No. 30/2024 before the Madhurantakam Subordinate Court, the petition filed by Tamilselvan against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Vilupuram Ltd was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish his claims regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred at 5:15 AM, and rejected his arguments about negligence and causation. The petition is accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts