Kothandaraman vs Sathiya Advocate - Paramasivam — 19/2020
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13 1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNCG130002082020
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
222/2020
Filing Date
08-09-2020
Registration No
19/2020
Registration Date
07-10-2020
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kothandaraman
Adv. Subramanian.S, A.Abdul Hayath
Respondent(s)
Sathiya Advocate - Paramasivam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 23-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: HMOP 19/2020 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 13.08.2025 In this family matter between Kothandaraman (petitioner) and Sathiya Advocate-Paramasivam (respondent), the respondent was examined under cross-examination on 13.08.2025. The respondent provided testimony regarding residence, children's education, and financial circumstances, disputing several claims made in the petition. The court found the respondent's statements regarding living arrangements in Mangalam, children's schooling at government institutions, and the basis for filing the petition to be credible. No further cross-examination was permitted, and the petition was dismissed based on insufficient grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: HMOP 19/2020 Court: Subordinate Court, Maduranthakam Date: 13.08.2025 In this family matter between Kothandaraman (petitioner) and Sathiya Advocate-Paramasivam (respondent), the respondent was examined under cross-examination on 13.08.2025. The respondent provided testimony regarding residence, children's education, and financial circumstances, disputing several claims made in the petition. The court found the respondent's statements regarding living arrangements in Mangalam, children's schooling at government institutions, and the basis for filing the petition to be credible. No further cross-examination was permitted, and the petition was dismissed based on insufficient grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts