Badrunisha vs Deepak Kumar — 3/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 43. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNCG130001292023

Arguments

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

125/2023

Filing Date

29-03-2023

Registration No

3/2023

Registration Date

29-03-2023

Court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 43

Petitioner(s)

Badrunisha

Adv. K.R.Narasimhan

Respondent(s)

Deepak Kumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

12-06-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Orders

23-02-2026

Orders

16-02-2026

Await Records

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: Badrunisha v. Deepak Kumar (I.A No. 6/2025) Badrunisha filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone a 34-day delay in filing an application to restore I.A No. 3/2023, which had been dismissed for non-appearance on 02.09.2025. The petitioner claimed she was suffering from viral fever and unable to attend court. The court found that the petitioner provided no explanation for the delay beyond her illness on the date of hearing and failed to state any reason or sufficient cause for the 34-day delay in filing the restoration application. The application was dismissed as devoid of merits with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Badrunisha v. Deepak Kumar (I.A No. 6/2025) Badrunisha filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone a 34-day delay in filing an application to restore I.A No. 3/2023, which had been dismissed for non-appearance on 02.09.2025. The petitioner claimed she was suffering from viral fever and unable to attend court. The court found that the petitioner provided no explanation for the delay beyond her illness on the date of hearing and failed to state any reason or sufficient cause for the 34-day delay in filing the restoration application. The application was dismissed as devoid of merits with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Maduranthakam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case