Badrunisha vs Deepak Kumar — 3/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNCG130001292023
Filing Number
125/2023
Filing Date
29-Mar-2023
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
29-Mar-2023
Court
Sub Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Badrunisha
Adv. K.R.Narasimhan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deepak Kumar
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Badrunisha v. Deepak Kumar (I.A No. 6/2025) Badrunisha filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone a 34-day delay in filing an application to restore I.A No. 3/2023, which had been dismissed for non-appearance on 02.09.2025. The petitioner claimed she was suffering from viral fever and unable to attend court. The court found that the petitioner provided no explanation for the delay beyond her illness on the date of hearing and failed to state any reason or sufficient cause for the 34-day delay in filing the restoration application. The application was dismissed as devoid of merits with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Await Records
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Await Records
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Await Records
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Await Records
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Await Records
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Sep-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
For further Proceedings
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Oct-2024
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Aug-2024
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Apr-2024
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Mar-2024
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jan-2024
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jan-2024
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Oct-2023
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2023
Case Summary: Badrunisha v. Deepak Kumar (I.A No. 6/2025) Badrunisha filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone a 34-day delay in filing an application to restore I.A No. 3/2023, which had been dismissed for non-appearance on 02.09.2025. The petitioner claimed she was suffering from viral fever and unable to attend court. The court found that the petitioner provided no explanation for the delay beyond her illness on the date of hearing and failed to state any reason or sufficient cause for the 34-day delay in filing the restoration application. The application was dismissed as devoid of merits with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts