Thirukalukundram Police Station vs SILAMBARASAN — 216/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG120016992025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-06-2025
Filing Number
1654/2025
Filing Date
16-07-2025
Registration No
216/2025
Registration Date
08-08-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram
Judge
1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
FIR Details
FIR Number
208
Police Station
THIRUKAZHUKUNDRAM
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thirukalukundram Police Station
Adv. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUKAZHUKUNDRAMPOLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
SILAMBARASAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC.216/2025 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court in Thirukalukundram recorded witness depositions (P.W. LW6 and P.W. 5 LW7) in this case involving an incident approximately one year prior where power was cut and an accident occurred. Both witnesses testified that they have limited direct knowledge of the incident details and signed police documents without full understanding of their contents. The court admitted the witnesses' testimonies as hostile witnesses and permitted cross-examination by the prosecution, with witnesses acknowledging inconsistencies between their police statements and court testimony regarding their presence at the incident location on 26.05.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.216/2025 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court in Thirukalukundram recorded witness depositions (P.W. LW6 and P.W. 5 LW7) in this case involving an incident approximately one year prior where power was cut and an accident occurred. Both witnesses testified that they have limited direct knowledge of the incident details and signed police documents without full understanding of their contents. The court admitted the witnesses' testimonies as hostile witnesses and permitted cross-examination by the prosecution, with witnesses acknowledging inconsistencies between their police statements and court testimony regarding their presence at the incident location on 26.05.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts