State Government vs M.Ramakrishnan Advocate - Tr.D.R.Manmadan, Tr.V.Thirunavukkarasu, Tr.V.Ilakkiya — 76/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG120011352019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
76/2019
Filing Date
02-05-2019
Registration No
76/2019
Registration Date
06-05-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram
Judge
1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
SADRAS
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
M.Ramakrishnan Advocate - Tr.D.R.Manmadan, Tr.V.Thirunavukkarasu, Tr.V.Ilakkiya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 76/2019 This document records the deposition of Witness 2 (P.W.2) before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram on 17.08.2023. The witness testified that they had no knowledge of the disputed matter and denied providing a written statement to police, though they acknowledged answering questions when asked. The court recorded the witness statement in open court, read it back to the witness in the presence of the accused, and the witness admitted it to be correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 76/2019 This document records the deposition of Witness 2 (P.W.2) before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram on 17.08.2023. The witness testified that they had no knowledge of the disputed matter and denied providing a written statement to police, though they acknowledged answering questions when asked. The court recorded the witness statement in open court, read it back to the witness in the presence of the accused, and the witness admitted it to be correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts