State Government vs Vignesh Advocate - Jayakumar B — 127/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG120010842022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
997/2022
Filing Date
12-09-2022
Registration No
127/2022
Registration Date
12-09-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram
Judge
1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
FIR Details
FIR Number
89
Police Station
SADRAS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APP 1
Respondent(s)
Vignesh Advocate - Jayakumar B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case CC.127/2022 This document contains witness depositions in a motor vehicle accident case. On April 17, 2019, a man named Padmanabhan was hit by a vehicle (registration TN 19 AX 2883) near a hardware store in Thirukalukundram and suffered serious injuries to his back and leg. Four witnesses testified that Padmanabhan was taken to a government hospital via ambulance and later shifted to Rajiv Gandhi Government Hospital, where he subsequently died. The witnesses provided statements about the accident circumstances, though cross-examination revealed credibility concerns regarding their accounts and potential bias as relatives or acquaintances of the deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case CC.127/2022 This document contains witness depositions in a motor vehicle accident case. On April 17, 2019, a man named Padmanabhan was hit by a vehicle (registration TN 19 AX 2883) near a hardware store in Thirukalukundram and suffered serious injuries to his back and leg. Four witnesses testified that Padmanabhan was taken to a government hospital via ambulance and later shifted to Rajiv Gandhi Government Hospital, where he subsequently died. The witnesses provided statements about the accident circumstances, though cross-examination revealed credibility concerns regarding their accounts and potential bias as relatives or acquaintances of the deceased. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts