State Government vs Ruban Advocate - B.Narayanan — 100125/2009
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,506(ii),341, 294(b),326. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG120001162009
Filing Number
100125/2009
Filing Date
15-09-2009
Registration No
100125/2009
Registration Date
15-09-2009
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram
Judge
1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
86/09
Police Station
MAMALLAPURAM
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ruban Advocate - B.Narayanan
Prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 125/2009 The court acquitted both accused (Ruban and Prakash) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), and 326. The incident involved an alleged knife attack on March 3, 2009, but the court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included: the main complainant and eyewitness gave unreliable testimony, the injured party died before trial, and critical police evidence was based solely on officer testimony. The court ruled reasonable doubt existed regarding the accused's guilt and ordered their release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 125/2009 The court acquitted both accused (Ruban and Prakash) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), and 326. The incident involved an alleged knife attack on March 3, 2009, but the court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included: the main complainant and eyewitness gave unreliable testimony, the injured party died before trial, and critical police evidence was based solely on officer testimony. The court ruled reasonable doubt existed regarding the accused's guilt and ordered their release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts