State Government vs Yoganantham Advocate - K. Elumalai — 74/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),323,324,506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG120000732018

Evidence

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

74/2018

Filing Date

05-03-2018

Registration No

74/2018

Registration Date

05-03-2018

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram

Judge

1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

KOOVATHUR

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 147,294(b),323,324,506(2)
MP/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Government
MP/3/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Government
MP/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section State Government

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Adv. APP I

Respondent(s)

Yoganantham Advocate - K. Elumalai

Sathish

Suresh

Bharathi

Magaraj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram

04-06-2026

Evidence

25-05-2026

Evidence

07-05-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-03-2023
Oral Evidence
09-02-2023
Oral Evidence

This document records witness depositions (P.W.3 and P.W.4) in Case No. CC.74/2018 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram, dated 09.02.2023. Both witnesses testified under oath, denying knowledge of the case details and claiming police coercion in filing the FIR. The court admitted both witnesses as prosecution witnesses and permitted cross-examination by the accused's counsel. The depositions were certified as accurate by J.M. A. Kadhiravan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness depositions (P.W.3 and P.W.4) in Case No. CC.74/2018 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram, dated 09.02.2023. Both witnesses testified under oath, denying knowledge of the case details and claiming police coercion in filing the FIR. The court admitted both witnesses as prosecution witnesses and permitted cross-examination by the accused's counsel. The depositions were certified as accurate by J.M. A. Kadhiravan. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case