Kelambakkam Police Station vs RAMYA — 4/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110047092025
e-Filing Number
30-12-2025
Filing Number
4569/2025
Filing Date
31-12-2025
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
343
Police Station
KELAMBAKKAM
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kelambakkam Police Station
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE KELAMBAKKAM LAW AND ORDER
Respondent(s)
RAMYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Kelambakkam Police Station v. Ramya (CC.NO.4/2026) Court Decision: The District Magistrate Court in Tirupporur acquitted defendant Ramya of all charges (IPC Sections 296(b), 115(2), and 351(2)) on March 23, 2026. The court found that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the key prosecution witnesses (the three alleged victims) testified contrary to the prosecution's case, denying they were abused or assaulted by the accused. Key Reasoning: Although the accused was charged with abusing, assaulting, and threatening three family members following a school van incident on September 10, 2025, the court determined that the testimonies of the primary witnesses contradicted the government's allegations. With the main victims refuting the charges, the prosecution could not establish the accusations with the required certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Kelambakkam Police Station v. Ramya (CC.NO.4/2026) Court Decision: The District Magistrate Court in Tirupporur acquitted defendant Ramya of all charges (IPC Sections 296(b), 115(2), and 351(2)) on March 23, 2026. The court found that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the key prosecution witnesses (the three alleged victims) testified contrary to the prosecution's case, denying they were abused or assaulted by the accused. Key Reasoning: Although the accused was charged with abusing, assaulting, and threatening three family members following a school van incident on September 10, 2025, the court determined that the testimonies of the primary witnesses contradicted the government's allegations. With the main victims refuting the charges, the prosecution could not establish the accusations with the required certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts