Kayyar Police Station vs MOORTHY — 477/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),324,506(2),326. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110040502025
e-Filing Number
03-11-2025
Filing Number
3928/2025
Filing Date
06-11-2025
Registration No
477/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
Kayaar
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kayyar Police Station
Adv. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYAR POLICESTATION
Respondent(s)
MOORTHY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 21-04-2026 | Trial |
| 20-04-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 477/2025 Summary The District Civil and Sessions Court, Thiruporur, acquitted all six defendants (Moorthy and five others) on April 29, 2026. The prosecution alleged that the defendants unlawfully assembled with weapons and assaulted three complainants on May 2, 2023, causing grievous hurt and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 326, and 506(2). However, the court found that the primary prosecution witnesses (the three alleged victims) contradicted the police case during trial, denying they were attacked or threatened. Without credible witness testimony to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, the court applied the benefit of doubt and discharged the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 477/2025 Summary The District Civil and Sessions Court, Thiruporur, acquitted all six defendants (Moorthy and five others) on April 29, 2026. The prosecution alleged that the defendants unlawfully assembled with weapons and assaulted three complainants on May 2, 2023, causing grievous hurt and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 326, and 506(2). However, the court found that the primary prosecution witnesses (the three alleged victims) contradicted the police case during trial, denying they were attacked or threatened. Without credible witness testimony to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, the court applied the benefit of doubt and discharged the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts