S. JAYAKUMAAR vs K. SIVAGNANAM — 1320/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351,356. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG110024632025

e-Filing Number

13-09-2025

Filing Number

2359/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

1320/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351,356

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S. JAYAKUMAAR

    Adv. SITTRARASU A

  2. 2.Sivakamasundari Rajendran

    Adv. SITTRARASU A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K. SIVAGNANAM

  2. 2.M. MOHAN

  3. 3.K.C. Muralidharan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 21-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 15-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 13-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 05-May-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 24-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 17-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 13-Oct-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP.NO.1320/2025 This document records the deposition of witness K. Periyakumaar (age 66) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Tirupporur on 13 October 2025. The witness, a resident of an apartment complex in Mambakkam since 2019, testified regarding multiple regulatory violations by the building's management and respondents. The witness alleged that the apartment complex violates environmental and construction norms, including: operating a wastewater treatment facility without required pollution control board approval (resulting in a ₹71.70 lakh fine), improper maintenance causing sanitation issues, unauthorized dumping of waste in nearby villages, and inadequate fire safety certification renewal since 2019. He further claimed respondent K. Sivagnanam (a former housing committee chairman and bank manager) abused his official position to facilitate these violations and subsequently retaliated against the witness for filing RTI requests and objections to irregularities—including passing a defamatory resolution against him on 23 August 2025 and circulating it to 1,875 residents to damage his reputation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1320/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP.NO.1320/2025 This document records the deposition of witness K. Periyakumaar (age 66) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Tirupporur on 13 October 2025. The witness, a resident of an apartment complex in Mambakkam since 2019, testified regarding multiple regulatory violations by the building's management and respondents. The witness alleged that the apartment complex violates environmental and construction norms, including: operating a wastewater treatment facility without required pollution control board approval (resulting in a ₹71.70 lakh fine), improper maintenance causing sanitation issues, unauthorized dumping of waste in nearby villages, and inadequate fire safety certification renewal since 2019. He further claimed respondent K. Sivagnanam (a former housing committee chairman and bank manager) abused his official position to facilitate these violations and subsequently retaliated against the witness for filing RTI requests and objections to irregularities—including passing a defamatory resolution against him on 23 August 2025 and circulating it to 1,875 residents to damage his reputation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case