Thiruporur Police Station vs MOORTHY — 447/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNCG110024352025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-09-2025

Filing Number

2331/2025

Filing Date

18-09-2025

Registration No

447/2025

Registration Date

18-09-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

335

Police Station

THIRUPORUR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),323

Petitioner(s)

Thiruporur Police Station

Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPORUR POLICE STATION

Respondent(s)

MOORTHY

RAMU

LAKSHMANAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Judgement

16-03-2026

Questioning

12-03-2026

Trial

07-02-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case 447/2025 Summary Thiruporur Police Station v. Moorthy, Ramu, and Lakshmanan The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntary causing hurt). The primary complainant's testimony contradicted the police investigation—he testified the defendants were his own villagers with whom he had reconciled, denying they abused or assaulted him. Since the main witness refuted the government's case, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 447/2025 Summary Thiruporur Police Station v. Moorthy, Ramu, and Lakshmanan The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntary causing hurt). The primary complainant's testimony contradicted the police investigation—he testified the defendants were his own villagers with whom he had reconciled, denying they abused or assaulted him. Since the main witness refuted the government's case, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case