Thiruporur Police Station vs MOORTHY — 447/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCG110024352025
e-Filing Number
18-09-2025
Filing Number
2331/2025
Filing Date
18-09-2025
Registration No
447/2025
Registration Date
18-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
335
Police Station
THIRUPORUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thiruporur Police Station
Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPORUR POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
MOORTHY
RAMU
LAKSHMANAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 07-02-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 447/2025 Summary Thiruporur Police Station v. Moorthy, Ramu, and Lakshmanan The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntary causing hurt). The primary complainant's testimony contradicted the police investigation—he testified the defendants were his own villagers with whom he had reconciled, denying they abused or assaulted him. Since the main witness refuted the government's case, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 447/2025 Summary Thiruporur Police Station v. Moorthy, Ramu, and Lakshmanan The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 323 (voluntary causing hurt). The primary complainant's testimony contradicted the police investigation—he testified the defendants were his own villagers with whom he had reconciled, denying they abused or assaulted him. Since the main witness refuted the government's case, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts