RAJSUNDAR vs CHANDIRASEKAR — 1279/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 233. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG110023732025
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
2269/2025
Filing Date
10-09-2025
Registration No
1279/2025
Registration Date
10-09-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJSUNDAR
Respondent(s)
CHANDIRASEKAR
MANJULA
SUPREETH KUMAR
SUGANYA GANGADHARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 13-05-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 20-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CMP.NO.1279/2025 RAJSUNDAR v. CHANDIRASEKAR, MANJULA, and SUPREETH KUMAR This is a witness deposition (Chapter XXIII Cr.P.C) recorded on 25.10.2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupporur. Petitioner Rajsundar testified regarding a matrimonial dispute involving his daughter's cancelled wedding. He alleged that respondents Chandirasekar and Manjula (parents) and their son Supreeth Kumar (groom, Canada-based) fraudulently obtained ₹17.5 lakhs and jewelry under the pretext of marriage, then withdrew from the engagement after demanding excessive dowry. Rajsundar filed police complaints and escalated to the Chief Minister's office seeking action against the respondents for cheating and causing mental distress. The deposition documents his complaints and failed reconciliation attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMP.NO.1279/2025 RAJSUNDAR v. CHANDIRASEKAR, MANJULA, and SUPREETH KUMAR This is a witness deposition (Chapter XXIII Cr.P.C) recorded on 25.10.2025 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupporur. Petitioner Rajsundar testified regarding a matrimonial dispute involving his daughter's cancelled wedding. He alleged that respondents Chandirasekar and Manjula (parents) and their son Supreeth Kumar (groom, Canada-based) fraudulently obtained ₹17.5 lakhs and jewelry under the pretext of marriage, then withdrew from the engagement after demanding excessive dowry. Rajsundar filed police complaints and escalated to the Chief Minister's office seeking action against the respondents for cheating and causing mental distress. The deposition documents his complaints and failed reconciliation attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts