Thiruporur Police Station vs BALAJI — 693/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNCG110018422024
e-Filing Number
14-10-2024
Filing Number
1709/2024
Filing Date
21-10-2024
Registration No
693/2025
Registration Date
23-10-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
THIRUPORUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thiruporur Police Station
Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPORUR POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
BALAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 693/2025 The District Magistrate Court in Thiruporur acquitted Balaji and his co-accused on March 23, 2026. Though charged under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene language), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation) for allegedly waylaying and abusing the complainant on June 6, 2024, the court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The primary prosecution witness (complainant) contradicted the case while testifying, claiming the accused were his relatives and denying the charges, which undermined the state's evidence, leading to their acquittal under Section 255(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 693/2025 The District Magistrate Court in Thiruporur acquitted Balaji and his co-accused on March 23, 2026. Though charged under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene language), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation) for allegedly waylaying and abusing the complainant on June 6, 2024, the court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The primary prosecution witness (complainant) contradicted the case while testifying, claiming the accused were his relatives and denying the charges, which undermined the state's evidence, leading to their acquittal under Section 255(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts