Inspector of Police Thiruporur PS vs RAJAGOPAL — 138/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),510. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG110017842024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-09-2024

Filing Number

1652/2024

Filing Date

07-10-2024

Registration No

138/2024

Registration Date

28-10-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

204

Police Station

THIRUPORUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(B),510

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police Thiruporur PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJAGOPAL

Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip

Victor John @ Appun

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Judgement

16-03-2026

Questioning

12-03-2026

Trial

10-03-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted three defendants (Rajagopal, Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip, and Victor John @ Appun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene speech), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant initially reported the alleged trespassing, abusive language, and death threats occurring on June 6, 2024, he later recanted his testimony during court examination, severely undermining the prosecution's case. Although a second government witness supported the charges through documentary evidence, the court determined this was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the primary victim's corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-03-2026
Oral Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted three defendants (Rajagopal, Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip, and Victor John @ Appun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene speech), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant initially reported the alleged trespassing, abusive language, and death threats occurring on June 6, 2024, he later recanted his testimony during court examination, severely undermining the prosecution's case. Although a second government witness supported the charges through documentary evidence, the court determined this was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the primary victim's corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case