Inspector of Police Thiruporur PS vs RAJAGOPAL — 138/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),510. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110017842024
e-Filing Number
30-09-2024
Filing Number
1652/2024
Filing Date
07-10-2024
Registration No
138/2024
Registration Date
28-10-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
204
Police Station
THIRUPORUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Thiruporur PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJAGOPAL
Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip
Victor John @ Appun
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted three defendants (Rajagopal, Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip, and Victor John @ Appun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene speech), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant initially reported the alleged trespassing, abusive language, and death threats occurring on June 6, 2024, he later recanted his testimony during court examination, severely undermining the prosecution's case. Although a second government witness supported the charges through documentary evidence, the court determined this was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the primary victim's corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted three defendants (Rajagopal, Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip, and Victor John @ Appun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene speech), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant initially reported the alleged trespassing, abusive language, and death threats occurring on June 6, 2024, he later recanted his testimony during court examination, severely undermining the prosecution's case. Although a second government witness supported the charges through documentary evidence, the court determined this was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the primary victim's corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts