Inspector of Police Thiruporur PS vs RAJAGOPAL — 138/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),510. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG110017842024

e-Filing Number

30-09-2024

Filing Number

1652/2024

Filing Date

07-Oct-2024

Registration No

138/2024

Registration Date

28-Oct-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

204

Police Station

THIRUPORUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),510

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Thiruporur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJAGOPAL

  2. 2.Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip

  3. 3.Victor John @ Appun

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted three defendants (Rajagopal, Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip, and Victor John @ Appun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene speech), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant initially reported the alleged trespassing, abusive language, and death threats occurring on June 6, 2024, he later recanted his testimony during court examination, severely undermining the prosecution's case. Although a second government witness supported the charges through documentary evidence, the court determined this was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the primary victim's corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 23-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 12-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 24-Dec-2024

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Dec-2024

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 07-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court in Thiruporur acquitted three defendants (Rajagopal, Ayyappan @ Sisubaba sagip, and Victor John @ Appun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene speech), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant initially reported the alleged trespassing, abusive language, and death threats occurring on June 6, 2024, he later recanted his testimony during court examination, severely undermining the prosecution's case. Although a second government witness supported the charges through documentary evidence, the court determined this was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt without the primary victim's corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case