K.Rajkumar vs Ramesh and others — 126/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b), 323, 427, 506(ii). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG110017622024

Filing Number

1634/2024

Filing Date

21-Sep-2024

Registration No

126/2024

Registration Date

21-Sep-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b), 323, 427, 506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Rajkumar

    Adv. S.Sundravadivelu, J.Dilliraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh and others

  2. 2.Dhayalan

  3. 3.Vadivel

  4. 4.Maari

  5. 5.Mohan

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 13-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-May-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 126/2024 Case Status: Witness Deposition (Ongoing Trial) On 6 May 2026, the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupporur recorded the testimony of PW1 (K. Rajkumar, age 40), a factory supervisor. Rajkumar testified about an incident involving alleged unauthorized entry and lock-breaking at a incense stick manufacturing facility owned by Sathish Kumar and Kamal Kumar. He filed a police complaint on 1 April 2023 against the respondents (Ramesh and others, Dhayalan and Vadivel). During cross-examination, the witness admitted that no physical evidence of the alleged lock-breaking tool was submitted to court and acknowledged prior civil disputes (CC 35, 36, 37/2010) between the parties. The case remains pending with witness examination continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 03-Jan-2026

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 30-Dec-2025

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 26-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 15-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 18-Aug-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 19-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 21-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 21-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 126/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 126/2024 Case Status: Witness Deposition (Ongoing Trial) On 6 May 2026, the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupporur recorded the testimony of PW1 (K. Rajkumar, age 40), a factory supervisor. Rajkumar testified about an incident involving alleged unauthorized entry and lock-breaking at a incense stick manufacturing facility owned by Sathish Kumar and Kamal Kumar. He filed a police complaint on 1 April 2023 against the respondents (Ramesh and others, Dhayalan and Vadivel). During cross-examination, the witness admitted that no physical evidence of the alleged lock-breaking tool was submitted to court and acknowledged prior civil disputes (CC 35, 36, 37/2010) between the parties. The case remains pending with witness examination continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case