Mohammed Hasheem vs Surendar — 122/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, 142. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110012862023
Filing Number
550/2023
Filing Date
26-May-2023
Registration No
122/2023
Registration Date
26-May-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammed Hasheem
Adv. Rajarajan.D.R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Surendar
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Aug-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: CC.NO. 122/2023 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirupporur Date: 25.08.2025 On 25 August 2025, the first witness (PW-1), Mohammed Asif, was examined under oath in this civil case. The witness, who is the complainant, affirmed the contents of the affidavit and identified three documentary exhibits (dated 04/03/2021, 10/03/2021, and 22/03/2021) as evidence. The respondent's counsel did not conduct cross-examination despite being present. The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2025
Copies
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jul-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 122/2023
Case Summary: CC.NO. 122/2023 Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirupporur Date: 25.08.2025 On 25 August 2025, the first witness (PW-1), Mohammed Asif, was examined under oath in this civil case. The witness, who is the complainant, affirmed the contents of the affidavit and identified three documentary exhibits (dated 04/03/2021, 10/03/2021, and 22/03/2021) as evidence. The respondent's counsel did not conduct cross-examination despite being present. The case proceedings continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts