D RAKESHKUMAR vs M MOHAN — 579/2025

Case under Bankingregulationact Section 217211AND356BNS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 22nd May 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG110010122025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-04-2025

Filing Number

956/2025

Filing Date

28-05-2025

Registration No

579/2025

Registration Date

28-05-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

BankingRegulationAct Section 217211AND356BNS
REGISTRATION ACT, 1908 Section Sec17

Petitioner(s)

D RAKESHKUMAR

Adv. SITTRARASU A

Respondent(s)

M MOHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

22-05-2026

Disposed

20-05-2026

Orders

13-05-2026

Orders

06-05-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

24-07-2025
Oral Evidence
05-01-2026
Oral Evidence

Case Summary: 579/2025 (D Rakeshkumar v. M Mohan) This witness deposition case involves petitioner D Rakeshkumar testifying about disputes regarding an SBI Unity Enclave residential project in Tirupurur. Rakeshkumar alleged that respondent M Mohan engaged in fraudulent valuation of the property (undervaluing it at ₹2,975 per sq ft when actual value was ₹10.5 crore), misappropriated funds collected from 20-30 homeowners (₹2-3 lakhs each) for incomplete interior works, and filed a false police complaint against him. Rakeshkumar claimed he had filed legitimate complaints with authorities and the High Court had ruled in his wife's favor against Mohan's association, yet Mohan attempted intimidation and filed the FIR in retaliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 579/2025 (D Rakeshkumar v. M Mohan) This witness deposition case involves petitioner D Rakeshkumar testifying about disputes regarding an SBI Unity Enclave residential project in Tirupurur. Rakeshkumar alleged that respondent M Mohan engaged in fraudulent valuation of the property (undervaluing it at ₹2,975 per sq ft when actual value was ₹10.5 crore), misappropriated funds collected from 20-30 homeowners (₹2-3 lakhs each) for incomplete interior works, and filed a false police complaint against him. Rakeshkumar claimed he had filed legitimate complaints with authorities and the High Court had ruled in his wife's favor against Mohan's association, yet Mohan attempted intimidation and filed the FIR in retaliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case