D RAKESHKUMAR vs M MOHAN — 579/2025

Case under Banking Regulation Act Section 217211AND356BNS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG110010122025

e-Filing Number

21-04-2025

Filing Number

956/2025

Filing Date

28-May-2025

Registration No

579/2025

Registration Date

28-May-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Banking Regulation Act Section 217211AND356BNS
Registration Act, 1908 Section Sec17

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D RAKESHKUMAR

    Adv. SITTRARASU A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M MOHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 20-May-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-May-2026

    Orders

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 579/2025 (D Rakeshkumar v. M Mohan) This witness deposition case involves petitioner D Rakeshkumar testifying about disputes regarding an SBI Unity Enclave residential project in Tirupurur. Rakeshkumar alleged that respondent M Mohan engaged in fraudulent valuation of the property (undervaluing it at ₹2,975 per sq ft when actual value was ₹10.5 crore), misappropriated funds collected from 20-30 homeowners (₹2-3 lakhs each) for incomplete interior works, and filed a false police complaint against him. Rakeshkumar claimed he had filed legitimate complaints with authorities and the High Court had ruled in his wife's favor against Mohan's association, yet Mohan attempted intimidation and filed the FIR in retaliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 22-Sep-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 25-Aug-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 24-Jul-2025

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

  22. 24-Jul-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 01-Jul-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 17-Jun-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 12-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 28-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 28-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 579/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 579/2025 (D Rakeshkumar v. M Mohan) This witness deposition case involves petitioner D Rakeshkumar testifying about disputes regarding an SBI Unity Enclave residential project in Tirupurur. Rakeshkumar alleged that respondent M Mohan engaged in fraudulent valuation of the property (undervaluing it at ₹2,975 per sq ft when actual value was ₹10.5 crore), misappropriated funds collected from 20-30 homeowners (₹2-3 lakhs each) for incomplete interior works, and filed a false police complaint against him. Rakeshkumar claimed he had filed legitimate complaints with authorities and the High Court had ruled in his wife's favor against Mohan's association, yet Mohan attempted intimidation and filed the FIR in retaliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case