D RAKESHKUMAR vs M MOHAN — 579/2025
Case under Bankingregulationact Section 217211AND356BNS. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 22nd May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG110010122025
e-Filing Number
21-04-2025
Filing Number
956/2025
Filing Date
28-05-2025
Registration No
579/2025
Registration Date
28-05-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D RAKESHKUMAR
Adv. SITTRARASU A
Respondent(s)
M MOHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-05-2026 | Orders |
| 13-05-2026 | Orders |
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 579/2025 (D Rakeshkumar v. M Mohan) This witness deposition case involves petitioner D Rakeshkumar testifying about disputes regarding an SBI Unity Enclave residential project in Tirupurur. Rakeshkumar alleged that respondent M Mohan engaged in fraudulent valuation of the property (undervaluing it at ₹2,975 per sq ft when actual value was ₹10.5 crore), misappropriated funds collected from 20-30 homeowners (₹2-3 lakhs each) for incomplete interior works, and filed a false police complaint against him. Rakeshkumar claimed he had filed legitimate complaints with authorities and the High Court had ruled in his wife's favor against Mohan's association, yet Mohan attempted intimidation and filed the FIR in retaliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 579/2025 (D Rakeshkumar v. M Mohan) This witness deposition case involves petitioner D Rakeshkumar testifying about disputes regarding an SBI Unity Enclave residential project in Tirupurur. Rakeshkumar alleged that respondent M Mohan engaged in fraudulent valuation of the property (undervaluing it at ₹2,975 per sq ft when actual value was ₹10.5 crore), misappropriated funds collected from 20-30 homeowners (₹2-3 lakhs each) for incomplete interior works, and filed a false police complaint against him. Rakeshkumar claimed he had filed legitimate complaints with authorities and the High Court had ruled in his wife's favor against Mohan's association, yet Mohan attempted intimidation and filed the FIR in retaliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts