D RAKESHKUMAR vs M MOHAN — 955/2025
Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG110008562025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-04-2025
Filing Number
800/2025
Filing Date
30-04-2025
Registration No
955/2025
Registration Date
02-06-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Petitioner(s)
D RAKESHKUMAR
Adv. SITTRARASU A
R. SIVAKAMASUNDARI
Respondent(s)
M MOHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 13-05-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 06-05-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 27-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 06-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 955/2025 This is a witness deposition (dated 07.02.2026) in a property dispute involving alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. Witness D. Rakeshkumar testified that petitioners purchased a house in 2016 with bank financing, but discovered discrepancies: the contract showed 575 sq ft while registration showed 468 sq ft, yet the bank approved 578 sq ft. The witness alleged the builder improperly transferred commercial complex land without consent, provided two separate agreements for one property, issued false GST charges without remitting funds to government, and failed to deliver completed properties. The court record documents these allegations without issuing a final judgment in this excerpt, as it captures only the witness examination phase under Chapter XXIII CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 955/2025 This is a witness deposition (dated 07.02.2026) in a property dispute involving alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. Witness D. Rakeshkumar testified that petitioners purchased a house in 2016 with bank financing, but discovered discrepancies: the contract showed 575 sq ft while registration showed 468 sq ft, yet the bank approved 578 sq ft. The witness alleged the builder improperly transferred commercial complex land without consent, provided two separate agreements for one property, issued false GST charges without remitting funds to government, and failed to deliver completed properties. The court record documents these allegations without issuing a final judgment in this excerpt, as it captures only the witness examination phase under Chapter XXIII CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts