D RAKESHKUMAR vs M MOHAN — 955/2025

Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG110008562025

e-Filing Number

20-04-2025

Filing Number

800/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

955/2025

Registration Date

02-Jun-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D RAKESHKUMAR

    Adv. SITTRARASU A

  2. 2.R. SIVAKAMASUNDARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M MOHAN

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 13-May-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-May-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Cmp Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Oral EvidenceView PDF

    Summary of Case 955/2025 This is a witness deposition (dated 07.02.2026) in a property dispute involving alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. Witness D. Rakeshkumar testified that petitioners purchased a house in 2016 with bank financing, but discovered discrepancies: the contract showed 575 sq ft while registration showed 468 sq ft, yet the bank approved 578 sq ft. The witness alleged the builder improperly transferred commercial complex land without consent, provided two separate agreements for one property, issued false GST charges without remitting funds to government, and failed to deliver completed properties. The court record documents these allegations without issuing a final judgment in this excerpt, as it captures only the witness examination phase under Chapter XXIII CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 06-Nov-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 28-Oct-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 25-Aug-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 11-Aug-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 24-Jul-2025

    Sworn Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 30-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 02-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 955/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 955/2025 This is a witness deposition (dated 07.02.2026) in a property dispute involving alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. Witness D. Rakeshkumar testified that petitioners purchased a house in 2016 with bank financing, but discovered discrepancies: the contract showed 575 sq ft while registration showed 468 sq ft, yet the bank approved 578 sq ft. The witness alleged the builder improperly transferred commercial complex land without consent, provided two separate agreements for one property, issued false GST charges without remitting funds to government, and failed to deliver completed properties. The court record documents these allegations without issuing a final judgment in this excerpt, as it captures only the witness examination phase under Chapter XXIII CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case