D RAKESHKUMAR vs M MOHAN — 955/2025

Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG110008562025

For further Proceedings

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2025

Filing Number

800/2025

Filing Date

30-04-2025

Registration No

955/2025

Registration Date

02-06-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Petitioner(s)

D RAKESHKUMAR

Adv. SITTRARASU A

R. SIVAKAMASUNDARI

Respondent(s)

M MOHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

25-05-2026

For further Proceedings

13-05-2026

For further Proceedings

06-05-2026

For further Proceedings

27-04-2026

For further Proceedings

06-04-2026

For further Proceedings

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Oral Evidence

Summary of Case 955/2025 This is a witness deposition (dated 07.02.2026) in a property dispute involving alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. Witness D. Rakeshkumar testified that petitioners purchased a house in 2016 with bank financing, but discovered discrepancies: the contract showed 575 sq ft while registration showed 468 sq ft, yet the bank approved 578 sq ft. The witness alleged the builder improperly transferred commercial complex land without consent, provided two separate agreements for one property, issued false GST charges without remitting funds to government, and failed to deliver completed properties. The court record documents these allegations without issuing a final judgment in this excerpt, as it captures only the witness examination phase under Chapter XXIII CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 955/2025 This is a witness deposition (dated 07.02.2026) in a property dispute involving alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. Witness D. Rakeshkumar testified that petitioners purchased a house in 2016 with bank financing, but discovered discrepancies: the contract showed 575 sq ft while registration showed 468 sq ft, yet the bank approved 578 sq ft. The witness alleged the builder improperly transferred commercial complex land without consent, provided two separate agreements for one property, issued false GST charges without remitting funds to government, and failed to deliver completed properties. The court record documents these allegations without issuing a final judgment in this excerpt, as it captures only the witness examination phase under Chapter XXIII CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case