Srinivasan vs The commissioner of police — 75/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110008422024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
752/2024
Filing Date
25-06-2024
Registration No
75/2024
Registration Date
25-06-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Srinivasan
Adv. Jayapraksh and Nirosha
Respondent(s)
The commissioner of police
The Inspector of Police
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Framing of Charges
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Framing of Charges |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 75/2024 This is a witness deposition proceeding, not a final order. On 02.03.2026, PW2 (Second Prosecution Witness) testified before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in Tirupporur regarding a criminal case involving alleged fraud and cheating. The witness testified that the accused borrowed approximately Rs. 9.5 lakhs from the complainant (Srinivasan) through various means in 2021 and subsequently disappeared without repaying the debt, causing financial loss to the complainant. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's counsel. The case remains pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 75/2024 This is a witness deposition proceeding, not a final order. On 02.03.2026, PW2 (Second Prosecution Witness) testified before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in Tirupporur regarding a criminal case involving alleged fraud and cheating. The witness testified that the accused borrowed approximately Rs. 9.5 lakhs from the complainant (Srinivasan) through various means in 2021 and subsequently disappeared without repaying the debt, causing financial loss to the complainant. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's counsel. The case remains pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts