R Pavithra vs P manikandan — 2/2025
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNCG110008332025
e-Filing Number
25-04-2025
Filing Number
787/2025
Filing Date
24-Apr-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
24-Apr-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R Pavithra
Adv. JEYARAJ E
Respondent(s)
-
1.P manikandan
-
2.R.Pasupathi
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jun-2026
Oral EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: DV.No.2/2025 This is a Domestic Violence case heard on 01.06.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Tiruporur. Petitioner R. Pavithra (a medical doctor) testified against respondents P. Manikandan and R. Pasupathi in cross-examination. The case involves allegations of dowry demands, alleged deception regarding employment details before marriage, financial disputes over marriage expenses, and claims of marital discord. Pavithra testified that the respondents demanded ₹5,00,000 for wedding expenses and dowry items including 30 sovereigns of gold, and that she subsequently transferred part of her salary to the first respondent. The cross-examination of the petitioner was concluded, and the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Cmp Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
Cmp Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Cmp Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Cmp Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Cmp Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Sep-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-May-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2025
Case Summary: DV.No.2/2025 This is a Domestic Violence case heard on 01.06.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Tiruporur. Petitioner R. Pavithra (a medical doctor) testified against respondents P. Manikandan and R. Pasupathi in cross-examination. The case involves allegations of dowry demands, alleged deception regarding employment details before marriage, financial disputes over marriage expenses, and claims of marital discord. Pavithra testified that the respondents demanded ₹5,00,000 for wedding expenses and dowry items including 30 sovereigns of gold, and that she subsequently transferred part of her salary to the first respondent. The cross-examination of the petitioner was concluded, and the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts