R Pavithra vs P manikandan — 2/2025

Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

DVC - Domestic Violence Case

CNR: TNCG110008332025

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

e-Filing Number

25-04-2025

Filing Number

787/2025

Filing Date

24-04-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

24-04-2025

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Petitioner(s)

R Pavithra

Adv. JEYARAJ E

Respondent(s)

P manikandan

R.Pasupathi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

06-06-2026

Evidence

01-06-2026

Evidence

18-05-2026

Evidence

06-05-2026

Evidence

27-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

18-08-2025
Oral Evidence
01-09-2025
Oral Evidence
01-06-2026
Oral Evidence

Case Summary: DV.No.2/2025 This is a Domestic Violence case heard on 01.06.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Tiruporur. Petitioner R. Pavithra (a medical doctor) testified against respondents P. Manikandan and R. Pasupathi in cross-examination. The case involves allegations of dowry demands, alleged deception regarding employment details before marriage, financial disputes over marriage expenses, and claims of marital discord. Pavithra testified that the respondents demanded ₹5,00,000 for wedding expenses and dowry items including 30 sovereigns of gold, and that she subsequently transferred part of her salary to the first respondent. The cross-examination of the petitioner was concluded, and the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DV.No.2/2025 This is a Domestic Violence case heard on 01.06.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Tiruporur. Petitioner R. Pavithra (a medical doctor) testified against respondents P. Manikandan and R. Pasupathi in cross-examination. The case involves allegations of dowry demands, alleged deception regarding employment details before marriage, financial disputes over marriage expenses, and claims of marital discord. Pavithra testified that the respondents demanded ₹5,00,000 for wedding expenses and dowry items including 30 sovereigns of gold, and that she subsequently transferred part of her salary to the first respondent. The cross-examination of the petitioner was concluded, and the case was adjourned for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case