PORCHEZHIYAN vs THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TAMBARAM DIVISION — 59/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 420,294(B),506(I). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110006102024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
555/2024
Filing Date
21-05-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
21-05-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PORCHEZHIYAN
Adv. NANCHIL J. RAJKUMAR, K. NANDHAKUMAR, A. ANANDAN, K. RAGUL
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TAMBARAM DIVISION
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KELAMBAKKAM POLICE.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Framing of Charges
Framing of Charges
Framing of Charges
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-05-2026 | Framing of Charges |
| 15-05-2026 | Framing of Charges |
| 11-05-2026 | Framing of Charges |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY This document records witness depositions in Case CC 59/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur, dated 18.04.2026. Witness 1 (Porchezhiyan, age 38) testified regarding purchasing a used car from the respondents on 01.06.2023, which later developed defects from an accident. Witness 2 (Rupini, age 36) confirmed witnessing the car purchase and full payment. The case involves a dispute over a vehicle transaction and alleged misrepresentation by the police respondents regarding the vehicle's registration and condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY This document records witness depositions in Case CC 59/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur, dated 18.04.2026. Witness 1 (Porchezhiyan, age 38) testified regarding purchasing a used car from the respondents on 01.06.2023, which later developed defects from an accident. Witness 2 (Rupini, age 36) confirmed witnessing the car purchase and full payment. The case involves a dispute over a vehicle transaction and alleged misrepresentation by the police respondents regarding the vehicle's registration and condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts