PUSHPARAJ vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 58/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110006092024
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
554/2024
Filing Date
17-05-2024
Registration No
58/2024
Registration Date
17-05-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUSHPARAJ
Adv. G. MURALI, E. NEELAMEGAN
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
J.P. PRASATH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 58/2024 This is a witness deposition (PW-1) in a criminal case where petitioner Pushparaj testified on 23.03.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupurur. Pushparaj, age 34, testified regarding loans he provided to respondent J.P. Prasath—totaling approximately ₹35.5 lakhs borrowed from four banks between July-August 2019. The witness testified about the loan repayment terms, Prasath's partial repayment until May 2022, and inconsistencies in his own complaint regarding the purpose of the loans. The cross-examination was adjourned on request, and the case remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 58/2024 This is a witness deposition (PW-1) in a criminal case where petitioner Pushparaj testified on 23.03.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupurur. Pushparaj, age 34, testified regarding loans he provided to respondent J.P. Prasath—totaling approximately ₹35.5 lakhs borrowed from four banks between July-August 2019. The witness testified about the loan repayment terms, Prasath's partial repayment until May 2022, and inconsistencies in his own complaint regarding the purpose of the loans. The cross-examination was adjourned on request, and the case remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts