PUSHPARAJ vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 58/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG110006092024
Filing Number
554/2024
Filing Date
17-May-2024
Registration No
58/2024
Registration Date
17-May-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruporur
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUSHPARAJ
Adv. G. MURALI, E. NEELAMEGAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
-
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
-
3.J.P. PRASATH
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Oral EvidenceView PDF
Summary of Case 58/2024 This is a witness deposition (PW-1) in a criminal case where petitioner Pushparaj testified on 23.03.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupurur. Pushparaj, age 34, testified regarding loans he provided to respondent J.P. Prasath—totaling approximately ₹35.5 lakhs borrowed from four banks between July-August 2019. The witness testified about the loan repayment terms, Prasath's partial repayment until May 2022, and inconsistencies in his own complaint regarding the purpose of the loans. The cross-examination was adjourned on request, and the case remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2025
Oral EvidenceView PDF
-
25-Mar-2025
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Sep-2024
Compromise
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Sep-2024
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2024
Summary of Case 58/2024 This is a witness deposition (PW-1) in a criminal case where petitioner Pushparaj testified on 23.03.2026 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Tirupurur. Pushparaj, age 34, testified regarding loans he provided to respondent J.P. Prasath—totaling approximately ₹35.5 lakhs borrowed from four banks between July-August 2019. The witness testified about the loan repayment terms, Prasath's partial repayment until May 2022, and inconsistencies in his own complaint regarding the purpose of the loans. The cross-examination was adjourned on request, and the case remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts