A.Kumar vs Nandagopal Rao — 1090/2023

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG100069142023

Filing Number

1657/2023

Filing Date

18-Oct-2012

Registration No

1090/2023

Registration Date

18-Oct-2012

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.Kumar

    Adv. T.Mageskumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nandagopal Rao

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  12. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  15. 01-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  18. 09-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  19. 01-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  21. 29-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  23. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  24. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  25. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  26. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  27. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  28. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  29. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  30. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  31. 24-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    In O.S. No. 1090/2023 (old no. 750/2012), the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Pallavaram dismissed the suit filed by A. Kumar against Nandagopal Rao regarding a property dispute. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a valid claim to the property and ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the respondent's ownership rights were established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  33. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  34. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  35. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  36. 02-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  37. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  38. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  39. 09-Sep-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  40. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  41. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  42. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  43. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  44. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  45. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  46. 12-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  47. 05-Apr-2024

    Issue of Process

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  48. 11-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  49. 21-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  50. 18-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  51. 16-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 18-Oct-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1090/2023

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 1090/2023 (old no. 750/2012), the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court at Pallavaram dismissed the suit filed by A. Kumar against Nandagopal Rao regarding a property dispute. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a valid claim to the property and ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the respondent's ownership rights were established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case