Nandagopal Rao vs Kumar — 45/2023
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 10 (2 ) (i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCOP - Rent Control Original Peition
CNR: TNCG100060852023
Filing Number
1414/2023
Filing Date
16-Aug-2023
Registration No
45/2023
Registration Date
16-Aug-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nandagopal Rao
Adv. Kosalaraman
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumar
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
01-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 45/2023 Petitioner: Nandagopal Rao Respondent: Kumar Court: District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram Date: 01.09.2025 The cross-examination of respondent Kumar concluded on this date. Kumar testified regarding property disputes with petitioner Nandagopal Rao, including claims over a jointly purchased property (manu-saathu) and alleged obstruction by Kumar preventing Rao's access. Kumar denied allegations of employing police or goons to block entry and claimed Rao is not a co-owner. The court recorded Kumar's testimony on property ownership, financial transactions, and disputed land parcels. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination of petitioner's counsel's examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
29-Jul-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
04-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Apr-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
19-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
06-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
07-Nov-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
20-Sep-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2023
Case Summary: 45/2023 Petitioner: Nandagopal Rao Respondent: Kumar Court: District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram Date: 01.09.2025 The cross-examination of respondent Kumar concluded on this date. Kumar testified regarding property disputes with petitioner Nandagopal Rao, including claims over a jointly purchased property (manu-saathu) and alleged obstruction by Kumar preventing Rao's access. Kumar denied allegations of employing police or goons to block entry and claimed Rao is not a co-owner. The court recorded Kumar's testimony on property ownership, financial transactions, and disputed land parcels. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination of petitioner's counsel's examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts