Nandagopal Rao vs Kumar — 45/2023
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 10 (2 ) (i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCOP - Rent Control Original Peition
CNR: TNCG100060852023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1414/2023
Filing Date
16-08-2023
Registration No
45/2023
Registration Date
16-08-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nandagopal Rao
Adv. Kosalaraman
Respondent(s)
Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 45/2023 Petitioner: Nandagopal Rao Respondent: Kumar Court: District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram Date: 01.09.2025 The cross-examination of respondent Kumar concluded on this date. Kumar testified regarding property disputes with petitioner Nandagopal Rao, including claims over a jointly purchased property (manu-saathu) and alleged obstruction by Kumar preventing Rao's access. Kumar denied allegations of employing police or goons to block entry and claimed Rao is not a co-owner. The court recorded Kumar's testimony on property ownership, financial transactions, and disputed land parcels. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination of petitioner's counsel's examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 45/2023 Petitioner: Nandagopal Rao Respondent: Kumar Court: District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram Date: 01.09.2025 The cross-examination of respondent Kumar concluded on this date. Kumar testified regarding property disputes with petitioner Nandagopal Rao, including claims over a jointly purchased property (manu-saathu) and alleged obstruction by Kumar preventing Rao's access. Kumar denied allegations of employing police or goons to block entry and claimed Rao is not a co-owner. The court recorded Kumar's testimony on property ownership, financial transactions, and disputed land parcels. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination of petitioner's counsel's examination-in-chief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts