Hasthinapuram Villagers Admn. Asson., rep. by its president M. Nagarajan vs The Assistant Engineer — 939/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG100059802023

Filing Number

1412/2023

Filing Date

09-Dec-2019

Registration No

939/2023

Registration Date

09-Dec-2019

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hasthinapuram Villagers Admn. Asson., rep. by its president M. Nagarajan

    Adv. M/s. Ragavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Engineer

  2. 2.The Tahsildar, Pallavaram

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, West Tambaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 939/2023 The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking permanent injunction to prevent government authorities from interfering with a 64-cent property in Hasthinapuram village. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish lawful possession and title over the disputed land, which government records classified as "kalam poramboke" (government land). Since title was heavily contested by defendants and complicated questions of fact and law arose, the court determined title could not be resolved in an injunction suit and should be pursued through a separate declaratory suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  14. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  17. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  18. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  19. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  20. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  21. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  23. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  24. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  25. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  26. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  27. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  28. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  29. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  30. 25-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  31. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  32. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  33. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  34. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  35. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  36. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  37. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  38. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  39. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  40. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  41. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  42. 19-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  43. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  44. 11-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  45. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  46. 25-Jul-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  47. 18-Jul-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  48. 08-Jul-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  49. 17-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  50. 24-Apr-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  51. 22-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  52. 15-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  53. 07-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  54. 28-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  55. 26-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  56. 27-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  57. 25-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  58. 15-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  59. 23-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  60. 19-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  61. 31-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  62. 24-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  63. 15-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  64. 19-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  65. 20-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  66. 18-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  67. 02-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  68. 15-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  69. 17-Oct-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  70. 26-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  71. 01-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 09-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 939/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 939/2023 The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking permanent injunction to prevent government authorities from interfering with a 64-cent property in Hasthinapuram village. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish lawful possession and title over the disputed land, which government records classified as "kalam poramboke" (government land). Since title was heavily contested by defendants and complicated questions of fact and law arose, the court determined title could not be resolved in an injunction suit and should be pursued through a separate declaratory suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case