Hasthinapuram Villagers Admn. Asson., rep. by its president M. Nagarajan vs The Assistant Engineer — 939/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG100059802023
Filing Number
1412/2023
Filing Date
09-12-2019
Registration No
939/2023
Registration Date
09-12-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hasthinapuram Villagers Admn. Asson., rep. by its president M. Nagarajan
Adv. M/s. Ragavan
Respondent(s)
The Assistant Engineer
The Tahsildar, Pallavaram
The Revenue Divisional Officer, West Tambaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS No. 939/2023 The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking permanent injunction to prevent government authorities from interfering with a 64-cent property in Hasthinapuram village. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish lawful possession and title over the disputed land, which government records classified as "kalam poramboke" (government land). Since title was heavily contested by defendants and complicated questions of fact and law arose, the court determined title could not be resolved in an injunction suit and should be pursued through a separate declaratory suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 939/2023 The District Munsif Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking permanent injunction to prevent government authorities from interfering with a 64-cent property in Hasthinapuram village. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish lawful possession and title over the disputed land, which government records classified as "kalam poramboke" (government land). Since title was heavily contested by defendants and complicated questions of fact and law arose, the court determined title could not be resolved in an injunction suit and should be pursued through a separate declaratory suit instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts