R.Vishwanathan vs N.Basheer Ahamed — 776/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG100047412023

Filing Number

1092/2023

Filing Date

21-Jun-2023

Registration No

776/2023

Registration Date

27-Jun-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.Vishwanathan

    Adv. Franklin J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.N.Basheer Ahamed

  2. 2.Jeydhoon B.V.

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  13. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 776/2023 Date: 09-09-2025 This is a property dispute case where petitioner R. Vishwanathan's cross-examination testimony was recorded. Vishwanathan testified regarding his purchase of a property, claiming he acquired it through a sale deed based on government records, though he acknowledged the deed document was defective. He clarified details about the property's previous ownership, inheritance claims by heirs, and his current occupation of the property. The court admitted his testimony as recorded in open court in Tamil, read back to him, and confirmed as correct. The case was adjourned with no cross-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  20. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  21. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  22. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  23. 11-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  24. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  25. 11-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  26. 17-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  27. 27-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  28. 22-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  29. 20-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  30. 10-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  31. 28-Aug-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  32. 05-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  33. 09-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  34. 18-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  35. 08-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  36. 14-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  37. 21-Feb-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  38. 12-Feb-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  39. 30-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  40. 29-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  41. 04-Dec-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  42. 16-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  43. 08-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  44. 11-Oct-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  45. 19-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  46. 16-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  47. 26-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

  48. 27-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 21-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 776/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 776/2023 Date: 09-09-2025 This is a property dispute case where petitioner R. Vishwanathan's cross-examination testimony was recorded. Vishwanathan testified regarding his purchase of a property, claiming he acquired it through a sale deed based on government records, though he acknowledged the deed document was defective. He clarified details about the property's previous ownership, inheritance claims by heirs, and his current occupation of the property. The court admitted his testimony as recorded in open court in Tamil, read back to him, and confirmed as correct. The case was adjourned with no cross-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case