R.Vishwanathan vs N.Basheer Ahamed — 776/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNCG100047412023
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
1092/2023
Filing Date
21-06-2023
Registration No
776/2023
Registration Date
27-06-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Vishwanathan
Adv. Franklin J
Respondent(s)
N.Basheer Ahamed
Jeydhoon B.V.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 776/2023 Date: 09-09-2025 This is a property dispute case where petitioner R. Vishwanathan's cross-examination testimony was recorded. Vishwanathan testified regarding his purchase of a property, claiming he acquired it through a sale deed based on government records, though he acknowledged the deed document was defective. He clarified details about the property's previous ownership, inheritance claims by heirs, and his current occupation of the property. The court admitted his testimony as recorded in open court in Tamil, read back to him, and confirmed as correct. The case was adjourned with no cross-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 776/2023 Date: 09-09-2025 This is a property dispute case where petitioner R. Vishwanathan's cross-examination testimony was recorded. Vishwanathan testified regarding his purchase of a property, claiming he acquired it through a sale deed based on government records, though he acknowledged the deed document was defective. He clarified details about the property's previous ownership, inheritance claims by heirs, and his current occupation of the property. The court admitted his testimony as recorded in open court in Tamil, read back to him, and confirmed as correct. The case was adjourned with no cross-examination ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts