D.Nandagopal Rao vs Sri Chamundi Leather and another — 30/2023
Case under Rent Recovery Act Section 10(2). Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCOP - Rent Control Original Peition
CNR: TNCG100034102023
Filing Number
908/2023
Filing Date
07-Dec-2016
Registration No
30/2023
Registration Date
07-Dec-2016
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D.Nandagopal Rao
Adv. Kosalaraman M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri Chamundi Leather and another
-
2.A.Kumar
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
22-Apr-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
06-Apr-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
24-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
29-Jul-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
12-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
04-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
16-Apr-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 30/2023 This is a property dispute case heard before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate in Pallavaram (Tamil Nadu). Petitioner D. Nandagopal Rao disputed ownership and possession rights over a property measuring 4,960 square feet (plots 35-36), claiming he had paid maintenance for 12 years and sought eviction of the respondent. The court examined competing claims regarding maintenance agreements, property transfer documents, and three separate revenue case filings by different parties. The court found insufficient evidence supporting the petitioner's claims of exclusive rights and rejected arguments that maintenance payments established ownership or that maintenance agreements existed. The case involved examination of property records and conflicting revenue department filings but the judgment does not grant relief to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
19-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
06-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
30-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
11-Dec-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
15-Nov-2023
Issue of Process
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
25-Sep-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
09-Aug-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
11-Jul-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
26-Jun-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram
-
12-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Dec-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2023
Case Summary: 30/2023 This is a property dispute case heard before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate in Pallavaram (Tamil Nadu). Petitioner D. Nandagopal Rao disputed ownership and possession rights over a property measuring 4,960 square feet (plots 35-36), claiming he had paid maintenance for 12 years and sought eviction of the respondent. The court examined competing claims regarding maintenance agreements, property transfer documents, and three separate revenue case filings by different parties. The court found insufficient evidence supporting the petitioner's claims of exclusive rights and rejected arguments that maintenance payments established ownership or that maintenance agreements existed. The case involved examination of property records and conflicting revenue department filings but the judgment does not grant relief to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts