Janani Sweets and Bakery vs V.Vaidyanathan — 501/2023

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section u/s 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG100030332023

Case disposed

Filing Number

788/2023

Filing Date

06-03-2019

Registration No

501/2023

Registration Date

06-03-2019

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section u/s 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Janani Sweets and Bakery

Adv. M.R.Eswara Kumar

Respondent(s)

V.Vaidyanathan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

30-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Judgement

16-03-2026

Judgement

10-03-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The District Munsif Court dismissed Janani Sweets & Bakery's suit for permanent injunction against landlord V. Vaidyanathan. The court found that the defendant followed proper legal procedure by issuing a notice dated 11.07.2019 requiring vacation within three months, and subsequently filed a rental eviction petition (RLTOP No.66/2023), thus negating the plaintiff's claim of unlawful interference. The plaintiff failed to prove threats of eviction without due process of law, having provided no specific dates or third-party witnesses to substantiate such allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court dismissed Janani Sweets & Bakery's suit for permanent injunction against landlord V. Vaidyanathan. The court found that the defendant followed proper legal procedure by issuing a notice dated 11.07.2019 requiring vacation within three months, and subsequently filed a rental eviction petition (RLTOP No.66/2023), thus negating the plaintiff's claim of unlawful interference. The plaintiff failed to prove threats of eviction without due process of law, having provided no specific dates or third-party witnesses to substantiate such allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case