M/s.Dharshan Arcade Flat Owners Association, rep by Anantha Athithan vs S.L.Nirmala mary — 293/2023

Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNCG100017852023

Arguments

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

466/2023

Filing Date

22-04-2022

Registration No

293/2023

Registration Date

22-04-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

Acts & Sections

SuitsValuationAct Section 22

Petitioner(s)

M/s.Dharshan Arcade Flat Owners Association, rep by Anantha Athithan

Adv. K.Senthil kumar

Respondent(s)

S.L.Nirmala mary

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallavaram

20-04-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Arguments

04-02-2026

Arguments

12-01-2026

Arguments

08-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

01-09-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: 293/2023 On September 1, 2025, the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Pallavaram recorded the sworn testimony of petitioner Anantha Athithan (representing M/s. Dharshan Arcade Flat Owners Association) under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1896. The petitioner submitted documentary evidence including a registered deed (dated 08.09.2000), personal registration certificate, complaint receipt, lawyer's notice, and association resolution. The case was adjourned to a future date pending further proceedings and arguments from the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 293/2023 On September 1, 2025, the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate at Pallavaram recorded the sworn testimony of petitioner Anantha Athithan (representing M/s. Dharshan Arcade Flat Owners Association) under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1896. The petitioner submitted documentary evidence including a registered deed (dated 08.09.2000), personal registration certificate, complaint receipt, lawyer's notice, and association resolution. The case was adjourned to a future date pending further proceedings and arguments from the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pallavaram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case