Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station vs KARHICK Advocate - V.KRISHNAMOORTHY — 569/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(A). Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 18th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060089992025
e-Filing Number
30-11-2025
Filing Number
8945/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
569/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
FIR Details
FIR Number
458
Police Station
CHENGALPATTU TALUK
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station
Adv. Inspector Of Police Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station
Respondent(s)
KARHICK Advocate - V.KRISHNAMOORTHY
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 569/2025 Court Decision: Karthick was found guilty and convicted under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(A) of the NDPS Act 1985 for illegal possession of 50 grams of ganja with intent to sell. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000, with default imprisonment of one month. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's case proved beyond reasonable doubt based on credible testimony from two police witnesses (PW1 and PW2) who consistently deposed about the seizure from the accused on 11.09.2022, corroborated by material evidence including the seizure mahazar and FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 569/2025 Court Decision: Karthick was found guilty and convicted under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(A) of the NDPS Act 1985 for illegal possession of 50 grams of ganja with intent to sell. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000, with default imprisonment of one month. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's case proved beyond reasonable doubt based on credible testimony from two police witnesses (PW1 and PW2) who consistently deposed about the seizure from the accused on 11.09.2022, corroborated by material evidence including the seizure mahazar and FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts