Maraimalai Nagar Police Station vs Sureshkumar Advocate - DHANANJEYAN M — 520/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8(c),20(b)(2)(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG060088792025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-12-2025
Filing Number
8825/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
520/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
FIR Details
FIR Number
487
Police Station
MARAIMALAINAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maraimalai Nagar Police Station
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE MARAIMALAINAGAR LAW AND ORDER
Respondent(s)
Sureshkumar Advocate - DHANANJEYAN M
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 520/2025 Summary This is a witness deposition proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Chengalpattu. Witness Senthilkumar (age 49) testified on 06.03.2026 regarding a NDPS (narcotic drugs) case. The witness, a health center employee, deposed about the recovery of contraband material during an operation on 24.10.2025, describing the seizure process and chain of custody. The accused was absent during the deposition. The witness testimony was recorded in Tamil, read over in open court, and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 520/2025 Summary This is a witness deposition proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Chengalpattu. Witness Senthilkumar (age 49) testified on 06.03.2026 regarding a NDPS (narcotic drugs) case. The witness, a health center employee, deposed about the recovery of contraband material during an operation on 24.10.2025, describing the seizure process and chain of custody. The accused was absent during the deposition. The witness testimony was recorded in Tamil, read over in open court, and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts