ASyed oli Fathima vs Chandrasekharan alies Sanjay — 2825/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 21st May 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG060079972025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-11-2025

Filing Number

7948/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

2825/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

Decision Date

21st May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)

Petitioner(s)

ASyed oli Fathima

Adv. RANJAN

Respondent(s)

Chandrasekharan alies Sanjay

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate-II, Chengalpattu

21-05-2026

Disposed

04-05-2026

Orders

17-04-2026

Enquiry

26-03-2026

Enquiry

23-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

21-05-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: 2825/2025 The Chengalpattu Judicial Magistrate dismissed petitioner A. Syed oli Fathima's plea to register an FIR against Chandrasekharan, finding the dispute purely civil in nature. Fathima alleged transferring ₹7.5 lakhs to Chandrasekharan for a property lease based on false promises; Chandrasekharan neither executed the lease deed nor fully repaid the amount. The court held that disputes involving money transactions and property lease agreements belong in civil court, not criminal proceedings, citing the principle that matters with civil flavor cannot be agitated criminally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2825/2025 The Chengalpattu Judicial Magistrate dismissed petitioner A. Syed oli Fathima's plea to register an FIR against Chandrasekharan, finding the dispute purely civil in nature. Fathima alleged transferring ₹7.5 lakhs to Chandrasekharan for a property lease based on false promises; Chandrasekharan neither executed the lease deed nor fully repaid the amount. The court held that disputes involving money transactions and property lease agreements belong in civil court, not criminal proceedings, citing the principle that matters with civil flavor cannot be agitated criminally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Chengalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case